Green Means
Green Codes, Not Tax Incentives
By Shannon Scott
In 2005 Nevada State Legislature
passed a green building incentive program to encourage healthier private
developments, or so it seemed. Developers
could receive up to $3 for every $1 spent meeting LEED requirements.
The 2005 Legislation, AB 3, required
the state to construct two LEED Silver or higher certification structures
during each two year budget cycle.
Simultaneously, it provided sales tax reductions of 2% for all
construction materials and a 50% property tax reduction for ten years to the
owners of privately constructed buildings. Referred to as “The Nevada Experience” it
yielded a national example of how not to structure green building
legislation.
Initially, losses projected to
exceed $940 million over the 2005-2007 biennium. This poorly researched legislation created a
financial crisis, forcing the next legislative session in 2007 to reexamine and
modify the program.
“The Nevada Experience” typifies
corporate influence on legislation. Rent-seeking,
common at the federal level where more money can be had, proves akin to run-away inflation. Nationally, G.E. is a major recipient. In Nevada, MGM-Mirage’s Project City Center
will likely receive $900 million over its life due to AB 3.
In 2007, the Nevada Legislature
voted to repeal AB 3, but not without grandfathering in six projects under the
2005 legislation. These modifications
reduced projected state losses from the $940 million to $493 million.
Green developments save corporations
billions over decades via reduced energy costs, increased employee
productivity, and greater real estate asset values. Green is smart business. Around the globe, corporations and developers,
large and small, understand this. It’s
not like multinational corporations and other businesses all of a sudden got a
social and environmental conscience.
Accounting teams compared and studied the bottom line – green development
methods beat traditional construction and building operations hands down. Everyone smiles on their way to the
investment company.
As of February 2011, Nevada legislation, AB
202, allowed for
partial property tax abatements for certain manufacturing businesses when
buildings are LEED Silver Certified. Obviously,
this bill is too limited and rewards likely one particular company’s piece of
real estate. AB 202 does nothing on a broad scale to
establish energy savings awareness, healthier indoor environments, or resource
preservation. The manufacturing
business, already poised to save huge due its green building measures, will now
benefit even more at public expense.
Legislators must stop giving tax
breaks to companies already profiting from going green via reduced energy
costs, increased real estate asset values, and improved employee
productivity. Individuals and companies
can receive federal tax breaks simply by installing green, energy saving
alternatives during construction. They
don’t need hard working Nevadan’s tax revenues.
The International Code Council
developed the International Green Construction Code (IgCC). The IgCC includes sustainability measures for
the totality of the construction process – site consideration, design,
construction, and ongoing operations.
The code makes buildings more efficient, reduces waste, and impacts
health, safety, and community well being.
Legislatively, adopting the IgCC proves the best option to ensure a sounder
economic future for Nevada, without tax payers subsidizing industry.
The IgCC is flexible. Jurisdictions can adopt the codes at several
levels of compliance, from core provisions to higher building performance
electives. It is also easily
enforceable, reviewed and often quickly adopted by expert inspectors who needed
safe construction coupled with sustainability.
A 29-member committee, taking input from more than 100 experts in
government, business, academia, and environmental health developed the IgCC
over the better part of a year.
Adopting IgCC avoids legislating
LEED Certifications, avoids property tax abatements, and offers up tax payer
friendly solutions to energy and resource savings.
Adopting IgCC would mean home buyers
in Elko County and across Nevada could be assured of buying or building newly
constructed homes with low utility costs, safer indoor environments, and constructed
from responsibly harvested and manufactured products – without having to take
the contractor’s or developer’s word for it.
Building codes mandate safety and
sanitation. Over decades, science and
research has informed code adoptions for public good. With soaring energy costs, a more fragile
environment, and human health problems increasing, let’s adopt new and
additional codes, not tax incentives.
No comments:
Post a Comment